Use an Answering Service to Eliminate Voicemail Jail
January 4, 2017
If I say voicemail jail, you immediately know what I’m talking about. No one likes voicemail jail, but many businesses subject their calls to this phone purgatory. In the name of good customer service, we need to put an end to voicemail jail, which tells you “For customer service, press 1; for sales, press 2; for accounts payable, press 3,” and so on.
Though people call it voicemail jail, these annoying recordings that businesses play is actually called auto-attendant, effectively an automated receptionist that doesn’t listen to you and compels you to force the reason for your call into one of their predetermined boxes.
From the callers’ perspective this provides no benefit and merely serves to cause added frustration. In theory these auto-attendant recordings speed callers to the right person. It seldom happens this way, with options that too often don’t apply but which callers must endure. It also sometimes has multiple levels to navigate.
Another frustration is that even though you’ve entered your account number, the person who you finally get to talk to will ask for it again—but that’s assuming you actually get to talk to a person. Too often voicemail jail keeps you incarcerated with no release date as you bounce around from one option to another.
Smart businesspeople are getting rid of their voicemail jail and actually serving the needs of their callers when they unplug their auto-attendant and hire a telephone answering service. An answering service provides these tangible benefits that no machine can duplicate:
A Real Person: Unless you’re calling to get your account balance, the reason you picked up the phone in the first place is to talk to a person, not a machine. Answering services provide real people who can talk with your callers.
A Listening Ear: Have you ever gotten so frustrated that you yelled at the recording and the limited options it provided? Unless they’re equipped with speech recognition, machines can’t listen to what you’re saying and respond in an informed, intelligent way. Answering services can.
Thoughtful Interaction: If you leave a message in voicemail, you have one chance to communicate. If you leave a confusing message, the person who later listens to it (assuming that eventually happens) will be confused, too. And if you leave out a critical piece of information, they won’t be able to help you anyway. But when you talk to a real person at an answering service, an effective dialogue takes place. People make the difference.
The Opportunity to Clarify: “Is that P as in Paul or T as in Tom?” This is a critical question that a machine can’t ask. Or how about “Did you say you did need it before lunch or you didn’t need it before lunch?” That one word carries a huge distinction that can mean the difference between success and failure. A machine can’t do that. An answering service can.
If your callers and customers are important to you, don’t force them into voicemail jail, but offer them freedom with the personal services of a professional answering service. When you use an answering service, a real person helps your callers skip all this automated nonsense, which makes everyone happy.
Janet Livingston is the president of Call Center Sales Pro, a premier sales and marketing service provider for the call center and telephone answering service industry—and who helps businesses and organizations find the perfect answering service. Contact Janet at firstname.lastname@example.org or call 800-901-7706.
Peter DeHaan is a freelance writer from Southwest Michigan.
www.Fuzionme.com CCSP Fuzion data portal provides ultimate 1-stop management resource for healthcare call center supervisors and managers Call center ...
Answering Service Case Study: Insurance Agent Loses with Answering Machine
By Peter DeHaan As an independent insurance agent, Jack Kippling had been in the industry most of his career. To grow his clientele he would buy maili...
Answering Service Case Study: Restoration Service Saves the Day—and the House
By Peter DeHaan Michael and Susan Carbine had spent the last six months doing a meticulous remodel of their beloved home. Their kitchen was last, and ...
Answering Service Case Study: Security Solutions for Security Guards
By Peter DeHaan Gerard Hoover sighed. His new security guard monitoring system wasn’t working as well as he hoped. With his staff of guards scattere...
Answering Service Case Study: Attorney Seeks Maximum Impact for Minimal Cost
By Peter DeHaan Dustin Murphy was stepping into his future, with law school behind him and his new practice before him. He needed to make the most of ...
Answering Service Case Study: The Dental Difference
By Peter DeHaan Terry Tyler loved caramel. But as he chomped on the sweet goodness of his mouthwatering treat, something bad happened, something reall...
Answering Service Case Study: Restoration Service Shines While Insurance Agent Falters
By Peter DeHaan With rain pouring down, Jerry Tresman and his wife, Mindy, looked in horror at the water rushing into the basement crock that held the...
Answering Service Case Study: Cleaning Up With Advertising
By Peter DeHaan Jerry Pelzer started Commercial Cleaning and Restoration Services as a one-man company, so he was seldom in the office when the phone ...