Strategic Rate Increases Provide Consistent Top Line Growth
December 16, 2016
Undercharging is a key reason for failure among many telephone answering services. Too many answering services, especially startups, simply don’t charge enough to cover their costs, account for overhead, and make a profit. They don’t last long.
Other answering services start out charging appropriate rates, but they fail to make periodic increases to cover escalating costs, the chief of which is payroll. After a few years of no increases, they find themselves in a dire situation where they are losing money and at risk of going out of business. But it will take a 20 to 30 percent across-the-board rate increase to make up the shortfall. By the time they realize this, they’re too afraid to act. What if their clients won’t accept the increase and leave for another answering service?
To avoid this, some answering services routinely increase the rates of all their clients every year. This accomplishes three things. First, this helps revenue better track with expenses. Second, since the increases occur regularly, they are smaller and therefore the fallout is less. Third, and most importantly, annual rate adjustments condition clients to expect—and accept—small rate increases each year.
Yet there is a key problem with these across-the-board increases. Quite simply, they’re not fair because they affect different clients differently. Though most answering service rates relate to the amount of effort required to service an account, they never fully align.
Therefore, one account can be profitable, while another account on the exact, same rate might be unprofitable. If you give all your accounts the same increase, say 3 percent, then the profitable account becomes more profitable, while the unprofitable account might still remain unprofitable, just not as bad. Even if the rate increase moves them to a breakeven point, that account is still not contributing to the answering service’s success.
Now, if you give an across-the-board rate increase, which of these two accounts is most likely to consider leaving your service over price? The more profitable one because their effective cost per minute is higher. (Regardless of your rate structure, your profitability analysis must always be based on revenue per time.)
That means your most profitable accounts are the most likely to cancel service after an across-the-board increase, while your least profitable ones are the most likely to stay. The result is losing the accounts you most want to keep and keeping the accounts that are actually pushing your business toward insolvency.
That’s no way to run a business. So smart answering service owners forgo the annual rate increase in favor of making strategic rate increases each month on their least profitable accounts. Doing this month after month, year after year, consistently produces ongoing top line growth, which trickles down to bottom line profits.
That’s the right way to run an answering service.
Janet Livingston is the president of Call Center Sales Pro, a premier sales and marketing service provider for the call center and telephone answering service industry. Contact Janet at email@example.com or 800-901-7706.
Peter DeHaan is a freelance writer from Southwest Michigan.
www.Fuzionme.com CCSP Fuzion data portal provides ultimate 1-stop management resource for healthcare call center supervisors and managers Call center ...
Answering Service Case Study: Insurance Agent Loses with Answering Machine
By Peter DeHaan As an independent insurance agent, Jack Kippling had been in the industry most of his career. To grow his clientele he would buy maili...
Answering Service Case Study: Restoration Service Saves the Day—and the House
By Peter DeHaan Michael and Susan Carbine had spent the last six months doing a meticulous remodel of their beloved home. Their kitchen was last, and ...
Answering Service Case Study: Security Solutions for Security Guards
By Peter DeHaan Gerard Hoover sighed. His new security guard monitoring system wasn’t working as well as he hoped. With his staff of guards scattere...
Answering Service Case Study: Attorney Seeks Maximum Impact for Minimal Cost
By Peter DeHaan Dustin Murphy was stepping into his future, with law school behind him and his new practice before him. He needed to make the most of ...
Answering Service Case Study: The Dental Difference
By Peter DeHaan Terry Tyler loved caramel. But as he chomped on the sweet goodness of his mouthwatering treat, something bad happened, something reall...
Answering Service Case Study: Restoration Service Shines While Insurance Agent Falters
By Peter DeHaan With rain pouring down, Jerry Tresman and his wife, Mindy, looked in horror at the water rushing into the basement crock that held the...
Answering Service Case Study: Cleaning Up With Advertising
By Peter DeHaan Jerry Pelzer started Commercial Cleaning and Restoration Services as a one-man company, so he was seldom in the office when the phone ...