Answering Service Rates Don’t Need to be Confusing
August 10, 2017
Too many answering services generate invoices that are too confusing. These folks include surprise fees and unexplained charges. And too often, these charges are not at all what clients expect.
Let’s look at some of the creative ways answering services have tried to hide their real rates from unsuspecting clients. This post exposes the truth so you can evaluate an answering service’s rates and save yourself from disappointment.
Units of Work: The fairest way for answering services to bill is by the amount of time worked. They pay their staff for their time, so it makes sense to bill their services the same way.
But not all answering services do. Some bill for units of work. What’s that mean? Whatever they want it to. Seriously. While this varies, a unit of work can occur when they answer your phone. Another unit of work can happen when they take a message. A third unit of work might be placing a call or delivering a message. Perhaps connecting a caller to you is also a unit of work.
Get the picture? One phone call can generate several units of work in no time at all.
A Month That’s Not a Month: Most companies bill by the month, twelve times a year. Some enterprising answering services, however, tweaked this to “28-day billing.”
Most people make the false assumption that 28-day billing is monthly billing. It’s not. If they bill you every twenty-eight days, you’ll receive thirteen bills a year and occasionally fourteen. If you think that’s not fair, we agree.
Surcharges and Extra Fees: Answering services have gotten quite creative in charging for additional services: phone number rentals, message storage, holiday surcharges, callouts, conferencing, simultaneous calls, research and database lookup fees, customer service, third-shift differentials, long distance, custom recordings, voicemail, message delivery, and the list goes on. And these can add up fast.
Not Really a Minute: Some services that say they bill by time, get creative. Though people assume they mean minutes, that’s not it at all. They mean “units of time.” A unit of time may be only 45 seconds or maybe even 30.
Therefore, a one-minute phone call could be two units of time. If you think that’s unfair, you’re right.
Creative Rounding: With computerized billing, there is no need for rounding, but some answering services still do. And they always round up. Sometimes they round up to the nearest minute. That means a call lasting sixty-one seconds is rounded up to two minutes.
Billing Done Right: Ethical invoicing avoids all of these tricks. Answering service bills should be short and straightforward.
The proper way to bill, which almost all industries follow, is to bill the base rate in advance and the usage charges (if any) in arrears. And for your first bill, there may be a one-time setup charge. That’s it. Nothing more.
When you hire a telephone answering service to help handle your communication needs, you deserve quality service and no unpleasant surprises, which includes a fair bill that’s easy to understand and lists only the charges you agreed to—and no more.
It’s that simple. But why do so many answering services fall short of these basic expectations when it comes to billing?
AnsweringServiceOne, a new kind of answering service that can become your number one resource to handle your communication needs. With Answering Service One you can reduce expenses, provide excellence to customers, enhance communications, and realize increased focus. To learn more, contact them at 800-901-7776 or email@example.com.
www.Fuzionme.com CCSP Fuzion data portal provides ultimate 1-stop management resource for healthcare call center supervisors and managers Call center ...
Answering Service Case Study: Insurance Agent Loses with Answering Machine
By Peter DeHaan As an independent insurance agent, Jack Kippling had been in the industry most of his career. To grow his clientele he would buy maili...
Answering Service Case Study: Restoration Service Saves the Day—and the House
By Peter DeHaan Michael and Susan Carbine had spent the last six months doing a meticulous remodel of their beloved home. Their kitchen was last, and ...
Answering Service Case Study: Security Solutions for Security Guards
By Peter DeHaan Gerard Hoover sighed. His new security guard monitoring system wasn’t working as well as he hoped. With his staff of guards scattere...
Answering Service Case Study: Attorney Seeks Maximum Impact for Minimal Cost
By Peter DeHaan Dustin Murphy was stepping into his future, with law school behind him and his new practice before him. He needed to make the most of ...
Answering Service Case Study: The Dental Difference
By Peter DeHaan Terry Tyler loved caramel. But as he chomped on the sweet goodness of his mouthwatering treat, something bad happened, something reall...
Answering Service Case Study: Restoration Service Shines While Insurance Agent Falters
By Peter DeHaan With rain pouring down, Jerry Tresman and his wife, Mindy, looked in horror at the water rushing into the basement crock that held the...
Answering Service Case Study: Cleaning Up With Advertising
By Peter DeHaan Jerry Pelzer started Commercial Cleaning and Restoration Services as a one-man company, so he was seldom in the office when the phone ...